How Did President Donald J Trump get so Close to Assassination?

by | Jul 18, 2024 | Election News, President

How Did A 20 Yr Old Almost Assassinate President  Trump?

How Did President Donald J Trump Almost Get Assassinated?   The attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, revealed significant lapses in security protocols by the U.S. Secret Service and local law enforcement. Despite early warnings and surveillance, Thomas Matthew Crooks managed to evade detection, gain access to a rooftop overlooking the rally site, and fire shots towards the stage, injuring multiple attendees and grazing the President. The incident underscored the critical need for comprehensive threat assessments, proactive surveillance, and swift, coordinated responses to potential threats. Moving forward, enhancing security measures and inter-agency coordination will be crucial in safeguarding public figures and maintaining the integrity of presidential security protocols.

The History of Our Secret Service

The U.S. Secret Service, under the Department of Homeland Security, holds the critical responsibility of safeguarding current and former Presidents of the United States, their immediate families, and other designated individuals. This protective mandate extends beyond the physical safety of these individuals to encompass the security of the presidency itself and the continuity of government in times of crisis. At the highest levels, the Secret Service operates under the leadership of the Director, who oversees a comprehensive team of professionals including Special Agents, Uniformed Division Officers, and investigative and technical specialists.

The Power of the President over the Secret Service

The President of the United States does have the authority to influence the allocation and level of protection provided by the Secret Service. This includes decisions on who receives protection, the scope of protection, and any adjustments based on current threats or personal circumstances. The Secret Service works closely with the White House, local law enforcement, and other federal agencies to assess risks, implement security protocols, and ensure the safety of protected individuals during public events, official travels, and daily activities.

Events Leading to the Attempted Assassination

  1. Pre-Event Security Preparation

    • Routine Assessments: Prior to President Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, the Secret Service conducted routine security assessments. These assessments typically involve evaluating potential threats, securing the venue, and coordinating with local authorities.

    What Should Have Happened. The Secret Service should have conducted a comprehensive threat assessment, considering potential risks like rooftop access and firearms within proximity. This would include thorough sweeps of nearby buildings and heightened vigilance based on intelligence gathered.

  2. Detection of Suspicious Activity

    • One Hour Before the Shooting: Local police officers spotted Thomas Matthew Crooks behaving suspiciously outside the rally perimeter and immediately alerted the Secret Service. This included concerns about his presence and behavior near the venue.

    This Should Have Happened. The Secret Service should have swiftly responded to reports of suspicious activity, initiating protocols to investigate and potentially detain individuals exhibiting concerning behavior, especially near high-profile events.

  3. Surveillance and Response Actions

    • Forty Minutes Before the Shooting: Crooks was observed with a rangefinder, a device used to measure distances, indicating potential pre-operational surveillance.
    • Twenty Minutes Before the Shooting: Despite initial alerts, Crooks successfully accessed a rooftop approximately 140 meters from the rally stage, unnoticed by security personnel.
    • Ten Minutes Before the Shooting: Rally attendees reported seeing Crooks on the rooftop, prompting further notification to law enforcement.

    What Should Have Happened. The Secret Service should have maintained continuous surveillance on suspicious individuals like Crooks, utilizing advanced surveillance techniques and monitoring systems to track movements and identify potential threats well before they reach critical vantage points.

  4. Security Intervention and Assassination Attempt

    • Two Minutes Before the Shooting: A police officer attempted to confront Crooks on the rooftop, but Crooks brandished an AR-15-style rifle, forcing the officer to retreat.
    • During the Shooting: Crooks fired several shots toward the rally stage, injuring multiple attendees and grazing President Trump’s ear.

    What Should Have Happened.  Security protocols should have included preemptive measures to prevent unauthorized access to rooftops so immediate neutralization of threats happen upon detection. Effective coordination between law enforcement and Secret Service agents should have ensured a swift response to mitigate potential harm.

  5. Immediate Aftermath and Response

    • Secret Service agents formed a protective barrier around President Trump while a sniper team neutralized Crooks with precise gunfire from a nearby elevated position.

    What Should Have Happened. Immediate deployment of counter-sniper teams and rapid extraction procedures should have been in place to swiftly neutralize threats and protect the President and attendees.

Comparison of Actual Events vs. Ideal Security Protocols

  • Actual Events: Despite early detection, Crooks managed to evade security measures, gain access to a strategic rooftop, and carry out an assassination attempt.
  • Ideal Security Protocols: Comprehensive threat assessments, proactive surveillance, immediate response to suspicious activities, and effective coordination between agencies would have minimized the risk and potential consequences of the incident.

Top Theories of How This Could Happen

The attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump revealed several vulnerabilities that contributed to the security breach. The top 10 reasons how this could have happened include. 1) inadequate pre-event threat assessment and surveillance. 2) delayed or insufficient response to suspicious activities. 3) failure to secure potential vantage points such as rooftops so all vantage point are covered. 4) lack of coordination and communication between Secret Service and local law enforcement. 5) underestimation of the threat posed by the perpetrator. 6) insufficient physical security measures at the rally site. 7) issues with training and preparedness of security personnel. 8) reliance on external security resources without effective oversight so items fall under the radar. 9) failure to implement enhanced security protocols based on identified risks.  10) a dynamic threat environment that posed unforeseen challenges.

Top Three Conspiracy Theories Surrounding the Attempted Assassination.

These include allegations of deliberate security lapses or sabotage within the Secret Service, speculations about political motives behind the assassination attempt, and theories suggesting a broader conspiracy involving multiple actors or organizations aiming to destabilize national security and political stability. These theories underscore the complexity and scrutiny surrounding high-profile security incidents involving public figures.

The Take away on Assassination Attempt?

The attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump underscores critical lapses in security protocols and coordination among law enforcement agencies. Enhanced measures, including advanced surveillance technologies, proactive threat assessments, and rigorous training for security personnel. Which is imperative to prevent similar incidents in the future. By learning from these lapses and implementing robust security reforms, the Secret Service can better fulfill its mandate to protect national leaders and uphold the integrity of the presidency.

With the election so close this story seemed important to us at marijuanaweedpot.com

 

When Will Marijuana Be Legal in Florida for Recreational Use?

by | Jul 11, 2024 | Legalization, Marijuana, Recreational, Weed

Marijuana to be Legal in Florida for Recreational in 2024

Florida stands at a pivotal moment in its marijuana legislation landscape, with growing anticipation surrounding Amendment 3, a ballot measure aimed at Cannabis Legal in Florida for Recreational use. This article explores the current status of marijuana legalization efforts in the state, recent polling data, campaigns supporting Amendment 3, potential impacts, challenges, and the legislative timeline.

Current Legal Landscape of Cannabis in Florida

In recent years, Florida has made significant strides in marijuana legalization, beginning with the approval of medical marijuana under Amendment 2 in 2016. This amendment was championed by attorney John Morgan, who has been a prominent advocate for cannabis reform in the state. Medical marijuana dispensaries, such as those run by companies like Trulieve, have since become commonplace across Florida, offering products ranging from THC oils to edibles. Despite these advancements, recreational use of marijuana remains illegal, although this could change pending the outcome of Amendment 3.

Recent Polling Data on Amendment 3

Recent polling data indicates a strong shift towards support for Amendment 3 among Florida voters. According to a poll conducted by Florida Politics, 64% of likely voters expressed their intention to vote in favor of the initiative. This sentiment was echoed in a separate poll by Fox News, which showed 66% of respondents supporting recreational cannabis legalization in the state. These polls highlight a broad spectrum of support across different demographics, with younger voters, in particular, showing overwhelming support for legalization.

For instance, Jason, a 25-year-old from Miami, expressed his views on the matter: “Legalizing marijuana would not only bring personal freedom but also economic benefits to our state. It’s time Florida caught up with the rest of the country.”

Legalization Efforts and Campaigns

Smart & Safe Florida, the organization behind Amendment 3, has launched a robust campaign to garner support for the initiative. The group has employed various strategies, including a $1.1 million radio ad campaign featuring attorney John Morgan. Their efforts coincide with “Freedom Month” celebrations in July, aiming to emphasize individual rights and decriminalization of marijuana possession.

Veronica, a spokesperson for Smart & Safe Florida, emphasized the campaign’s goals: “We believe that legalizing recreational marijuana is a step towards reducing unnecessary arrests and promoting personal freedom.”

Legal in Florida for Recreational

Proponents of Amendment 3 argue that legalizing recreational marijuana could have significant economic benefits for Florida. States like Colorado and California have demonstrated substantial tax revenue generation from cannabis sales. This money could potentially fund education and healthcare initiatives in Florida. Moreover, legalization could alleviate the burden on law enforcement and reduce the number of individuals incarcerated for non-violent drug offenses.

Michael, a business owner in Tampa, shared his perspective: “Legalization could create new business opportunities and jobs in sectors like cultivation, retail, and tourism. It’s a win-win for the economy and personal liberty.”

Challenges and Opposition

Despite growing support, Amendment 3 faces opposition from various quarters. Some critics argue that legalizing recreational marijuana could lead to increased substance abuse and public health concerns. Additionally, there are regulatory and enforcement challenges that policymakers would need to address, such as impaired driving laws and workplace regulations.

Edward, a retired police officer from Orlando, voiced his concerns: “We need to consider the potential risks and consequences of legalizing a substance that could impact public safety and health. It’s important to proceed cautiously.”

Comparison with Other States

Looking at states that have already legalized recreational marijuana provides valuable insights for Florida. For example, Oregon has seen a decrease in black market activities since legalization, while California has benefited from increased tax revenue. These states have also implemented regulations to ensure responsible use and mitigate potential negative impacts.

Legislative Process and Timeline

If Amendment 3 passes in the November general election, the next steps would involve legislative and regulatory processes to implement the new laws. This would include establishing licensing frameworks for cultivation and retail sales, setting tax rates, and developing public health and safety guidelines. The timeline for full implementation would depend on the specifics outlined in the amendment and subsequent legislative actions.

Conclusion

The momentum behind Amendment 3 reflects a significant shift in public opinion towards marijuana legalization in Florida. With strong polling data, supportive campaigns, and potential economic benefits. The legalization of recreational marijuana could soon become a reality in the Sunshine State. However, challenges and regulatory considerations remain pivotal in shaping the future landscape of cannabis legislation. As Floridians await the November election results, the debate over Amendment 3 continues to evolve. They will be influencing discussions on personal freedom, economic growth, and public health. Also, read the FDA’s view on this Issue.

For more information on Amendment 3 and the latest updates on marijuana legalization in Florida, visit Marijuanaweedpot.com.

N.J. May Extend August deadline for towns to decide if they want Recreational weed business

by | Aug 13, 2021 | Legalization, Marijuana, Pot, Recreational, Weed

N.J. May Extend August deadline for towns to decide if they want Recreational weed business. The deadline is here to decide. They will welcome or block future legal marijuana businesses, a state lawmaker wants to Extend the Deadline by 60 days.
Marijuana, Weed, Pot on The Recreational weed business.

Marijuana, Weed, Pot on The Recreational weed business.

Assemblyman Christopher Tully, D-Bergen, Recently introduced a bill  that gives local elected officials an Extra 60 days beyond August’s deadline to enact an ordinance either Allowing or banning Recreational Weed Business and cannabis Stores and Dispensaries from opening in their Towns. As of now the NJ Governor made a Law for local Governments who take no action by the deadline. They would have to abide by a set of rules for five years. The law was written this way in order to allow the Massive Marijuana industry more Chances for Success.

Edmund DeVeaux, An Officer of the NJ CannaBusiness Association, endorsed this legislation. Absent state rules regulating the industry, which are also due on Aug. 21. Who Stated “The one thing that has been clear since February of this year has been the confusion over municipal guidelines in the emerging cannabis economy”. And “The NJCBA is in conversations with several communities as to how to best deal with the looming opt-in/opt-out deadline. Supporting the extension is one more way the NJCBA supports municipalities in ensuring the state develops a responsible, sustainable, diverse, and profitable cannabis industry”.

State Legislature Need to move fast if they wanted to Place the bill in Law. Lawmakers had until the end of June to hold hearings, vote on it and send it to Gov. Murphy before the Legislature Went on recess.

Sea Isle, Brick Town and Bridge Water are among the towns that have banned The Recreational Weed Business and Marijuana sales.  Other communities have said they are opting to block Pot businesses until the state Cannabis Regulatory Commission releases a set of rules use to regulate the new market.